There are those that say we can not enact stricter gun laws
because the Constitution and the Supreme Court have clearly expressed that any
of these laws would not be Constitutional.
The best of these people and legislators’ site numerous cases
and portions of the Constitution to support their claim.
But the same people that claim they cannot enact gun restrictions
are the very same people that keep passing legislation restricting or forbidding
abortions.
The Supreme Court has ruled more than a generation ago that
abortions are Constitutional.
It has not stopped the various governing bodies around the
country of passing legislation to find “wiggle” room in restricting abortions.
Their attempt is to challenge Roe v Wade and restrict
abortion everyway possible and allow the courts to decide the law’s fate.
So, why don’t the very same legislative bodies also try to
find “wiggle” room in the Supreme Court’s decision on weapons?
My thoughts are that it must be because the NRA has serious
money invested in these legislators that makes it difficult to impossible for
them to attempt passing legislation.
No comments:
Post a Comment